The research article submitted to this online journal will be peer-reviewed. The accepted research articles will be available online (free download) following the journal peer-reviewing process. The language used in this Journal is English. Detail information about reviewing, download Reviewer Kit.
Reviewing a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. However, it is a time-consuming responsibility. Hence, Fundamental Journal’s Editorial Board, authors, and audiences appreciate your willingness to accept this responsibility and your dedication. Fundamental Journals adheres to a double-blind peer-review process that is rapid and fair and also ensures a high quality of articles published. In so doing, Fundamental Journal needs reviewers who can provide insightful and helpful comments on submitted manuscripts with a turnaround time of about 4 weeks. Maintaining Fundamental Journal as a scientific journal of high quality depends on reviewers with a high level of expertise and an ability to be objective, fair, and insightful in their evaluation of manuscripts. Please consider the following:
Reviewing manuscript critically, but constructively and preparing detailed comments on the manuscript to help authors improve their work
Reviewing multiple versions of a manuscript as necessary
Providing all required information within established deadlines
Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal
Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript they are asked to review
Reporting possible research misconducts
Suggesting alternative reviewers in case they cannot review the manuscript for any reasons
Treating the manuscript as a confidential document
Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript
Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow they identify the authors
Not identifying themselves to authors
Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer
Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work
Informing the editor if he/she finds the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to his/her knowledge
Writing review report in English only
Authoring a commentary for publication related to the reviewed manuscript.
Here list of items that need to be reviewed:
Novelty of the topic
Valuable contribution to the science
Adding new aspects to the existed field of study
Structure of the article submitted and its relevance to authors’ guidelines
EBSCO(USA), DOAJ , CrossRef, CrossMark, DOI, SAO/NASA.ADS, Google Scholar, Georgetown University Library(USA), Georgetown University(USA), New Jour, Electronic Journals & Newsletters, Know Journals, GetInfo TIB(German National Library of Science AND Technology, WorldCat libraries, WZB Electronic Journals, (Library and Research Information Berlin, Germany, Leibniz-Institute for Psychology Information(ZPID), Germany, SLUB, (Die Sächsische Landesbibliothek–Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek) Wir führen Wissen, Germany, The Saxon State Library - State and University Library, Germany, ZDB-Journals Database, Germany, KIT Library(Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Germany, University of Heidelberg, Germany, Library System University of Hamburg, Germany, Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, Germany, VUfind Library, Germany, Kiel University Library, Germany, Saarland University Library, Germany Universitätsbibliothek: Detailansicht EZB, Germany and more.